Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?

Categories: [ Chemtrails ]

Contrails over London in 1944

Vapour trails left by British bombers on route to attack flying-bomb sites encircle the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral. London, 1944.

All those who passionately believe that "contrails dissipate quickly" whereas "chemtrails linger" and are deeply offended by the sceptical position that TNRA takes in regard to these claims, are free to "unlike" Truth News.

If, on the other hand, you would like to engage in rational debate, you're most welcome to do so.

However, please be advised that the information I have to impart may be shocking and difficult to grasp if you have been a "chemtrail alarmist" for a long time.

The often cited claim that "normal contrails dissipate quickly" is total bunkum.

There is not a shred of science to backup that claim. Nothing, nada, zippo!

Those who promote this idea are simply repeating something they read on a web page without checking sources.

CONTRAIL SCIENCE

For a contrail to form, suitable conditions must occur immediately behind a jet engine in the expanding engine exhaust plume. A contrail will form if, as the exhaust gases cool and mix with surrounding air, the humidity becomes high enough (or, equivalently, the air temperature becomes low enough) for liquid water to condense on particles and form liquid droplets. If the local air is cold enough, these newly formed droplets then freeze and form ice particles that make up a contrail.

Because the basic processes are very well understood, contrail formation for a given aircraft flight can be accurately predicted if atmospheric temperature and humidity conditions are known.

After the initial formation of ice, a contrail evolves in one of two ways. If the humidity is low, the contrail will be short-lived. Newly formed ice particles will quickly evaporate. The resulting contrail will extend only a short distance behind the aircraft. If the humidity is high, the contrail will be persistent. Newly formed ice particles will continue to grow in size by taking water from the surrounding atmosphere. The resulting line-shaped contrail extends for large distances behind an aircraft. Persistent contrails can last for hours while growing to several kilometers in width and 200 to 400 meters in height. Contrails spread because of air turbulence created by the passage of aircraft, differences in wind speed along the flight track, and possibly through effects of solar heating.

Thus, the surrounding atmosphere’s conditions determine to a large extent whether or not a contrail will form after an aircraft’s passage, and how it evolves. Other factors that influence contrail formation include engine fuel efficiency, which affects the amount of heat and water emitted in the exhaust plume.
- source

TNRA is informed by science and is not interested in propping up anyone's belief systems, and we don't apologise for that.

But, please, don't take it from me, speak to any meteorologist or any pilot and they'll tell you straight, that there is HUGE variation in the length and persistence of contrails. Sometimes they don't form at all, other times they form, but disspate quickly, other times they persist and spread out.

That's the facts folks, and it's been that way since planes first went up in the sky.

If you believe otherwise, I'm afraid you've been conned.

Forgive me if I seem rude or impatient on this topic, but every few months I come across a new wave of people who have been subjected to the same false propaganda about chemtrails, and I have to run the same arguments and cite the same articles over and over again. It does wear one's patience down.

Before making some kind of angry reply, I urge you to read this article and associated links. It's fairly detailed, and deals with most of the usual claims made by chemtrail alarmists.

Finally, let me qualify all this by saying that I do not doubt that geo-engineering programs exist, and that, indeed, some of the patented techniques discussed at international forums include the creation of artificial cirrus cloud. Does this, however, entitle you to conclude that every spreading contrail you see is an example of such geo-engineering?

Think about it.

Related Links

Comments

Please review the Terms of Service before reading or responding to comments.

What puzzles me is that certain people, some with more degrees than a thermometer, appear not to have observation skills able to discern the difference between condensation trails and obvious aerosols, even though the differences are often before their eyes and the evolution of the aerosols has been taking place for many years.
I guess being a dumb farmer deprives me the ability to believe black is white and argue the cause of such a nonsense.
But I still want to know, if the things are lingering contrails, why there can be much more than 10 times the number of jets when rain is likely?
And are the the pilots lunatics, in the true sense of the word, as the incidence of their activity is voluminously more apparent around full moon?
Or could it be that rain is more likely around full moon?
And do 3, 4, 8 jets make contrails at the same time and, at times, in formation?
For what reason?
Could they be passenger jets flying in formation?
Why?
RAAF?
Why?
Hold on….UFOs?

By Cris on 2014 12 13 - 06:40:06

Andrew Adams wrote:

“you know precicesly what the lie is, you pretend i made a threat.”

But you can’t quote the sentence where I said that?

By Josh on 2014 12 13 - 14:41:44

well if i didnt make a threat f.u.c.k.face .. what the hell are you on about?

my god… what are you? 10 years old? f.u.c.k. off… grow up

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 13 - 20:38:40

you cunts say a 757 hit the pentagon… but you cant prove it… just another lie

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 13 - 20:40:26

I have said earlier:

“Please point out specifically where I lied.”

Andrew Adams replied:

“you accused me of making threats against retarded glynn.. ”

Now you can’t even quote the lie. So why did you claim that I lied there?

That’s a claim without any proof, a baseless accusation, no matter how you try to wiggle out of it.

By Josh on 2014 12 14 - 01:32:50

Why don’t Josh and co honestly, scientifically and factually answer my questions?

By Cris on 2014 12 14 - 03:18:42

Cris,

I have given you plenty of explanations, with references.

You are repeating the same statements over and over, but you haven’t told me why you think my explanations are wrong.

Did you have look at Flightradar 24, at least?

By Josh on 2014 12 14 - 03:24:32

Bulldusticus Maximus Please explain why there is an increase of up to over a 100 times, not percent, the jet traffic where I live when rain is immanent?
Could it have something to do with water regulation that is being rolled out on the premise of drought?
I see the planes and what they doing. I don’t just regurgitate the propaganda of the NWO.

By Cris on 2014 12 14 - 03:44:06

Cris,

once more: the planes are always there. You just don’t see them if there are no contrail conditions.
Approaching rain improves contrail conditions, so you start noticing the planes.

Can you provide a snapshot from Flightradar 24 when there are indeed very few planes in the vicinity of your home? It should be easy for you.

By Josh on 2014 12 14 - 04:01:36

i dont need to quote anything shithead, its all there for everyone to see..
you said you alerted glynn ” for obvious reasons” - those reasons, you said, were because i was making threats.. that being, that dickheads like him would be easier to take out on the ground than aquiring a ground to air missile launcher.

and then glynn joined in, asking me if i was making a threat against dickheads..

and now youre claiming you didnt accuse me of making threats.. and claiming you never lie..

you simply can not, not lie.

and you continually avoid answering specific questions, hoping no one will notice, if you simply ramble on incoherently about other things..

prove a 757 hit the pentagon shithead -

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 14 - 06:09:25

dickhead says

once more: the planes are always there. You just don’t see them if there are no contrail conditions.

another lie.. planes are perfectly visible even if there are no contrail, or chemtrails. another lie easily proven by anyone who cares to look up

what a moron

Approaching rain improves contrail conditions, so you start noticing the planes.

plenty chemtrails visible even when there is no rain approaching.. your “logic” is a fail

you are repeating the same bullshit over and over, but you can not answer a simple question.. do you have any proof a 757 hit the pentagon?

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 14 - 06:13:35

youre comment here is where you said i made a threat dipshit..

By Josh on 2014 12 12 - 00:53:53

Andrew Adams,

you have written: “Much easier to take out dickheads like Glynn on the ground”

In the context of your aggressive and extremely foul language this can be very well perceived as a threat. That’s why I wrote:

“Are you aware that you just confirmed his concern?”

so, did i make a threat or didnt I? simple question, think you can manage a yes no answer?

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 14 - 06:21:06

Andrew Adams wrote:

“another lie.. planes are perfectly visible even if there are no contrail”

Why, because you declare it so? Any other reference? I recommend this one (to Cris also).
And don’t cry “disinformation!” without even reading it, rather see if you can find a factual error in that roundup.

Others have come to the same wrong conclusion, like the guy who posted this video.

BTW, I wonder if you have ever thought about what constitutes a lie. A hint: it’s not a disagreeing point of view. And if you claim that I lied, you prove that or the claim is wrong.

By Josh on 2014 12 14 - 06:42:39

Andrew Adams wrote:

“so, did i make a threat or didnt I?”

Well, several posts ago you wrote:

“Much easier to take out dickheads like Glynn on the ground”

In the context of your aggressive and extremely foul language this can be very well perceived as a threat.

By Josh on 2014 12 14 - 06:48:46

so now we are back to you saying i made a threat are we? well dickhead? have you called the cops then? if not, why not?

i dont need to watch any of your f.u.c.k.ed up videos thanks, i know what i see without the need for you to tell me what im looking at, when you cant even see it..

like i said, if you have proof that there is no such thing as chemtrails, post it

also lumpen, if you have proof of a 757 hitting the pentagon post it..

liar

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 14 - 11:55:20

hey f.u.c.k-knuckle

In the context of your aggressive and extremely foul language this can be very well perceived as a threat.

perceptions is it? you have shown how your cognisant reasoning is non existant, so go ask a grown up.. is what i wrote a threat or not, then get back to me with a yes or no answer

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 14 - 12:09:03

also show how colourful language constitutes a threat, and where i have shown aggression..
actually .. dont bother.. ill just add it to your list of lies..

By Andrew Adams on 2014 12 14 - 12:11:39

BM Can you answer anything?
How obvious does it have to be?
Maybe one jet seen one day(without a trail) and over a hundred another day.
Can we be real here.
I don’t need radar.
I can see the planes.
Why would I see none or 1 one day and 100 plus the next?
Are you having a credibility crisis?

By Cris on 2014 12 14 - 13:31:57

Cris wrote:

“Can you answer anything?”

I did. What specifically was wrong about my answers?

“I don’t need radar.”

What is the reason why you won’t look at a flight tracker website?

“I can see the planes.”

There are several factors that make it hard to see jet planes at travel altitude if they are not contrailing.

- They are small

- Empty field myopia

- Saccadic masking

- Atmospheric conditions (thin haze)

You will find a concise explanation of these factors here

By Josh on 2014 12 14 - 23:13:20

Maximus Bulldustics
I don’t need radar because I can see the planes.
Do you really think that everyday there are over a hundred jets in my little part of the South Burnett.
Could you please be real.
There have been a few days that there have been so many the sky has turned metallic grey.
One day the sun looked so weird people were calling radio stations asking what was happening.
Are you being paid for this?

By Cris on 2014 12 15 - 03:56:52

Page 47 of 55 pages ‹ First < 45 46 47 48 49 > Last ›

RECLAIM AUSTRALIA IS DOOMED

Although I agree with many of their ideas, the forces reigned against RAM are too great, violent, statist and reactionary for them to remain a non-political, broad based, multi-ethnic, community protest group for much longer. The Left and their Antifa nihilist fellow travelers are already pushing them towards the extreme Right, by calling them racists and Islamophobes and so on. Whilst the extreme Right have aligned themselves with RAM. With fascists of the Left and Right pressuring them they will not be able to remain beyond the Left-Right divide and will inevitably move to the Right - the extreme Right. Which is already happening. A development which will alienate decent Australians of all ethnic backgrounds many of whom currently support them.

The RAM leadership have already established open alliances with the Patriotic Front (the ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration) Australia First and Golden Dawn, a Greek neo-Nazi party. Members of these collectivist groups are currently attending RAM demonstrations all over Australia.

There is a real need in Australia to establish a political movement beyond the Left-Right divide and their vested interests, a movement that questions the current direction Australia is heading i.e. the direction the Left/Right and their extremes would like to take it; that questions the efficacy of state sponsored multiculturalism, as opposed to a proper, non-discriminatory immigration policy; that questions the validity of political correctness; that is politically neutral, anti-war and pro environment; that is opposed to all collectivists ideologies (fascisms of the Left and Right); that would dismantle the power pyramids of corporations and banks and their ability to impact on government; that would dissolve all anti-terror laws and all laws that impose on the rights and freedom of the individual and the people.

(The ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration)

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reclaim-australia-rally-set-for-sydney-on-sunday-20150718-gifb9s.html

http://australiafirstparty.net/news/reclaiming-australia-queensland-senate-campaign/

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 07 26 - 15:36:56
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Hello there I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don韙 have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

By Prova a Adidas Neutro Originals Nizza Nero Giallo on 2015 07 20 - 08:41:30
From the entry 'Statism, the greater good and the big lie'.

I second Keith’s assertion that Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He bangs on about Halaal being a scam and money maker for Islam (and no I don’t support Halaal whatsoever), but makes excuses for its counterpart Kosher as being a somehow legitimate. Double standards? When I confronted him about this fact he went off on a convoluted tirade about Israel being some sort of “Bastion of Democracy” in the middle east…Really!, I will leave that one up to the readers to decide on. I found that MH came across as disingenuous to say the least.

By Citizen Scorn on 2015 07 19 - 07:33:43
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

Without doubt, TNR is one of the best, if not the best alternative news source on the net. Which doesn’t mean Herewood is always right. His job, I believe, is to present the facts as he sees them as an objectively as possible, without fear or favor. For this, he has my respect and support. But I believe he needs to be careful and to think a little deeper about the problems of “racism,” in Australia. He has labelled the Reclaim Australia Movement as racist. I’m wondering if his objectivity is a little weak on this point, a little without foundation.

Of course all political movements have its fringe groups and individuals. We make a distinction between, for example, a Muslim and a fundamentalist Muslim (Islamist), and by so doing we don’t claim that all Muslims are blood thirsty fanatics. If its good for the Muslims, then its good for RAM, which is bound to attract a few lunatics and real racists. But to brand the entire movement as “racist” is wrong; it is the same ploy that is used by the mainstream media and its left-wing, establishment Marxist boot boys.

One of the first things I noticed when i attended a RAM rally recently were the amount of non-white people in attendance, including Aboriginals. In fact the main banner of RAM contains an Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag. Speakers at their rallies have included Jews, Arabs, Indians, Aboriginals, Chinese and so on. What does this tell you? Is this really a fascist-Nazi-racist movement whose stated aim are the eradication and exclusion of other cultures, in place of some sort of Aussie white Reich, or is this just propaganda that is being propagated by the left for their own political interests. Consequently, we all know where the culmination of their politics have led, historically speaking, which are to the imposition of terror and dictatorships.

We can be thankful for small mercies, in terms of the Left, which today mostly tends to attract collectivists, establishmentarians and the privileged sons and daughters of the upper bourgeoisie, who seems to share one thing in common, nativity….

By Eugene on 2015 07 18 - 16:03:54
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He hasn’t even been citizen for but a few years. But, he makes out like he was born there. ALSO - this guy spent 30 years in Thailand working shady businesses. I would wager that his primary purpose in being an activist is that he wants to make money off selling merchandise.

By Keith on 2015 07 17 - 20:51:15
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

good to see you putting out some new shows heraward

freely the banana girl is to a certain extent a troll, as is her boyfriend durian rider. they have been trolling the fitness community on youtube for some time… and yes they are extreme but they are also trolls. They use their trolling to spread their message. currently, another dude called vegangains is trolling the fitness community as well.

i am a vegetarian, and it was seeing this documentary on the pork industry that started me on the vegetarian path. for anyone interested, its pretty off the charts disturbing and its australian as well. its pretty much made by dudes breaking into pork farms and filming what they find

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KArL5YjaL5U

Would the world be better if people cared where their food came from? probably, they might then care about other things too

do you become a better person if you dont eat meat? i feel like a better person mainly because animals aren’t being hurt because of me. i dont feel humans have to eat meat really… or at least not much. How can you watch that documentary on pork, know that that is pretty much whats going on and turn a blind eye to it? I think its basic empathy and just saying well ‘i like bacon so yeah’ is in my opinion wrong and i can see freleys point of view to an extent. In my opinion, at least these people believe in something. i see my money as my vote, henceforth im ethical as to what i do with it. free range eggs became mainstream for exactly this reason… although im pretty sure woolies and coles lobbied the state to change the definition of the word ‘free range’ at some point. I dont eat beef because the amount of resources that go into growing a cow are pretty crazy. Think about how much grass that cow needs to eat before it is harvested and how much space it requires. think of how many vegies you could grow in the same space with the same amount of water. lamb? comon, think about what your doing here… but that being said i think most vegans are total loons. People like freeley should be advocating for the destruction of lions and tigers, as lions and tigers murder other animals in truly horrific style. if we humans are smart enough to not harm animals, then we should be stopping the animals that harm other animals from existing. Freeley also kills birds when she flies in aeroplanes so she is a hypocrite.

feminism is one of the biggest problems in society today and although there is some valid historical basis to it, the liberation of the human female from their biology is in my opinion largely a product of the technological advance of humans. sufferagettes where never machine gunned on the streets, unlike the men that where drafted and sent off to war to die just a few years earlier. as technology has advanced, women have advanced as well, however now its going way too far and is pretty blatantly anti male in many respects. i view feminism in its modern context as a tool of the social marxists that really isnt doing society a great deal of good at this time. its screwing up gender dynamics and is wrecking women and men for each other. i see it as low frequency, lowest common denominator idiocy, just like a lot of the the race baiting ‘is this racist’ stuff getting around that is being perpetuated pretty much as a distraction, divide and conquer strategy by the power elite. idiots love this kind of bicker and beef… it would be funny if it wasn’t so serious

anyway

I agree with steven friar. gods a maniac

good show… keep making them

By r0Kb3B0p on 2015 07 14 - 21:05:32
From the entry 'Addictions, obsessions, fanaticisms and distractions'.

Really truthfull.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:56:36
From the entry 'Defending your personal health choices'.

Yeah sure authority aware.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:28:55
From the entry 'What is the future of Australia?'.

Stay tuned for more rules here as usually is the case!!!

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:21:50
From the entry 'Mass media disinformation and brainwashing dissected'.

Almost two months since the last broadcast! How the hell can you expect people to donate when you don’t broadcast? Looks like the ship of truth has sprung a leak. This broadcast has been part of my life almost since its inception…it is one of the few alternative news sources that hasn’t gone off the deep end, by dilution credible information with crap e.g. Fairdinkum Radio and Info Wars…Pittard started FR with some incredibly interesting material, but then he flipped…Today he sounds like a fundamentalist preacher, the Christian equivalent to a Fanatical Islamist. As an atheist, I think he’s really ###### up a potentially good show. As for Info Wars, all they would have to do to improve is dump Alex Jones, what a shit-for-brains. I reckon Jones and Pittard are allowed to proliferate, because they’re so stupid and harmless. I suppose they have some entertainment value, and along with David Icke are living examples of how low the alternative media has sunk. Truth News Radio is, or should I say was, way ahead of them all ahead of them all in terms of credibility How sad that its come to this.

By Eugene on 2015 06 28 - 17:28:56
From the entry 'Introducing Internet.org: Mark Zuckerberg's free 'private' internet which will soon be rolled out to 4 billion+ people'.

Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?

Comments

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories