Chemtrails Explained!

In part 2 of tonight's show John Bursill returns to grapple with the mysteries of chemtrails (or "persistent contrails" as they are sometimes called) . For those new to the subject, here is a quick introduction from wikipedia:

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some contrails are actually chemicals or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public. Versions of the chemtrail conspiracy theory circulating on the internet and radio talk shows theorize that the activity is directed by government officials. As a result, federal agencies have received thousands of complaints from people who have demanded an explanation. The existence of chemtrails has been repeatedly refuted by government agencies and scientists around the world.

The United States Air Force has stated that the theory is a hoax which "has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications". The British Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated that chemtrails "are not scientifically recognised phenomena". The Canadian Government House Leader has stated that "The term 'chemtrails' is a popularized expression, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence."

The term chemtrail is derived from "chemical trail" in the similar fashion that contrail is an abbreviation for condensation trail. It does not refer to common forms of aerial spraying such as crop dusting, cloud seeding or aerial firefighting. The term specifically refers to aerial trails allegedly caused by the systematic high-altitude release of chemical substances not found in ordinary contrails, resulting in the appearance of supposedly uncharacteristic sky tracks. Believers of this theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be for global dimming, population control, weather control, or biowarfare and claim that these trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.

In the first half of the show we cover a number of major breaking stories in Australia and overseas.

Links for tonight's show:

(thanks to Craig Stanford for the chemtrails links)

Dennis Kucinich (one of the only remaining good people in the US congress) has introduced a bill into the house naming Chemtrails as "exotic weapons"

German Military Admits Chemtrailing for "Weather Modification"

U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere

The Government's Top-Secret Efforts To Control Mother Nature

WWII Contrails

Stories from Part 1:

Half of GPs refuse swine flu vaccine over testing fears

H1N1 vaccines plan will go ahead: PM

CIA hired Blackwater for al-Qaida assassination programme

Apologies for the poor audio in this episode - something went wrong with my microphone!

Comments

Please review the Terms of Service before reading or responding to comments.

posted earlier: The same logic applies in relation to the moratorium. Almost all governments except the government of the USA have signed it, so the task in all countries now is to find out who was sent to represent their country at the Biological Diversity conference in Nagoya and starting from these persons raise the question of why their governments have signed a moratorium they are not respecting. In the context of this question it becomes more difficult to put forward the usual disinformation, but if the attempt is made to claim that your government IS observing the moratorium on geoengineering, the demand should be to get this claim in writing.

By roasted on 2010 12 10 - 07:21:21

“http://www.harold-holt.net/” The 2nd law of the universe is a friendly reminder. Thank you Zeist.

By nuts on 2010 12 10 - 08:23:19

I thought a lot of you would enjoy that little lightning bolt of wisdom. :D

By Zeist on 2010 12 10 - 08:41:09

Handbook for a New Paradigm: http://www.trufax.org/handbooks/paradigmvol1.html I feel this thread has reached its end. Good bye & good luck.

By nuts on 2010 12 10 - 10:11:38

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, may all your wishes come true!

By Christmasmen on 2010 12 10 - 11:54:02

History: Great Battles Medieval – ??? ???????????? ?????????, ??????????? ????????? ????? ????? ??????? ? ????????. ?????? ???? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ??? ????????? ???????, ?????????? ?? 40 ????????? ??????? – ?? ??????? ?? ??????????? ????? ?? ?????????. http://besplatno-kachaem.info/igra/

By insancyInceli on 2010 12 10 - 14:26:50

Comments on Rebecca Campbell The question Rebecca Campbell asks here “if the purpose of solar radiation management” is benignly to prevent global warming, why is it done even now in secret??” is a question that is often asked by Nikos Katsaros, Greece’s best-known anti-chemtrails campaigning scientist. Rebecca goes on to say that “many of the now environmentally-conscious public would accept this explanation if it were publicly given”, something which is quite possibly - and unfortunately - true, but it is still a surprising remark to come from a person whose views on climate change, as far as I know, tend towards anthropogenic climate change scepticism. Surely climate change sceptics would not number among those who would “accept this explanation”. Does not G. Edward Griffin in “What in the World are they Spraying” make heavily ironical remarks about how “when the truth comes out” the geoengineers will say “we did it for your own good”. He might joke about this, but is the joking a sign of possible future “acceptance”??? Perhaps I should make this a real question to G. Edward Griffin rather than a rhetorical question. In fact this idea of a future “coming clean” on the part of the geoengineers has always to me seemed the least likely of possible outcomes, and also a factor that makes one wonder just where present official policies of deceit over geoengineering can possibly lead and what the ultimate result of them will be. I cannot see how the geoengineers and their corporate and military-industrial-complex backers after so many years of telling lies are going to be able to negotiate a future “coming clean”. Their way of handling the contradictions of their policies consists in telling one story to one clientele: climate change scepticism for the conservatives, and another story: climate change scare-mongering and, surreptitiously, geoengineering to the other: liberals, leftists, ecologists. Internally consistent, dispassionate, persuasive, hype-free scientific narrative is precisely what they have never been able to deliver. How will this be able to change in future? The logic of the political system obliges them to act as they do. They cannot just decide to act differently. The historian and anti-nuclear activist E.P. Thompson, one of the leaders of the non-aligned European anti-nuclear movement of the nineteen eighties, promoted a satirical quasi-Marxist notion he called “exterminism”, which he saw as a phenomenon underlying the nuclear arms race of the “two superpowers”, the USA and the Soviet Union. He saw the Cold War as structured around an “inertial deadlock”, whose objective by-product was the nuclear arms race. I would like to argue that this same inertial deadlock has been reproduced in today’s climate controversy. The protagonists today are not the competing nuclear superpowers of the USSR and the USA but the climate activists on one hand and the climate skeptics on the other. And both sides of that controversy have their supporters, and even to some extent their origins, in the nuclear weapons laboratories of America’s side (the winning side) of the Cold War. The experiences that led E.P. Thompson to his theory of inertial deadlock were youthful experiences of membership of the Communist Party. At a certain point he decided that defending pro-Soviet policies of “defensive” nuclear weapons possession was sterile and counter-productive. He went on to become one of the founders of Britain’s Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and a pioneering supporter of the demand for British unilateral nuclear disarmament. I see many similarities between the stance of the old-style supporters of “defensive” Soviet nuclear weapons possession and present-day climate change activists who are still unaware of the role of geoengineering in the climate change debate. They have been co-opted into defending one side of a scenario of “inertial deadlock”. When the other side, the more aggressive “sceptic” side, gains the upper hand, as occurred with the “Climategate” scandal in the runup to the December 2009 Copenhagen climate summit , they are thrown onto the defensive, and remain locked into the defensive mode. They are becoming increasingly aware that they are “not winning”. But who IS winning? The climate change skeptics?? They are not winning either. They are as disoriented at “winning” the climate change debate as they were by winning the Cold War. Climate change has become the magic wand for justifying a whole array of destructive policies from nuclear power generation through genetic modification to carbon trading and geoengineering. Neither the climate change skeptics nor the climate change true believers who are ignorant of geoengineering (the majority) can resist the power of the magic wand: they remain participants in the bipolar debate of mainstream politics whose aim is – precisely – to reproduce the inertial deadlock. The skeptics remain skeptical even of valuable breakthroughs achieved by the other side, such as the moratorium on geoengineering pushed through at the Nagoya Convention on Biological Diversity. The climate change true believers engage in skirmishes over side-issues: the “don’t nuke our climate” initiatives that focus only on the most blatant and superficial forms of disinformation: the idea that nuclear energy is “clean” and “carbon free”. Rebecca Campbell’s paper on “Solar Radiation Management”, submitted to the Royal Society, is an excellent starting point for debate and a powerful exposure of the most obvious kind of deceit involved in the “dialogue” with the public that the Royal Society is now trying to initiate. But the deceit goes much deeper and will not be able to be adequately analysed until other sectors of civil society: the climate change movement, the anti-nuclear movement, begin to show a capacity for much more radical self-criticism and self-understanding. The anti-nuclear movement is in such dire straits at the moment that perhaps some progress can be expected with them, some opening of the mind towards the realities of “chemtrails”, for example. Paper submitted to the British “Royal Society” on “Solar Radiation Management” “Solar Radiation Management”: A Sunblock on the Light of Truth The mission of science should be to discover the truth of nature; the mission of philosophy is to discover the nature of truth. It is only when the nature of truth is respected that the truth of nature can be discovered. Respect for the nature of truth is called intellectual and moral honesty, and it is intellecual and moral honesty that would seem to be lacking in this call for papers on the feasibility and desirability of what is here being euphemistically termed “solar radiation management”. This is because what is being benignly portrayed here as being merely proposed has, for at least the past fifteen years, been clandestinely practiced, against the very ethics by which authentic, ethical science is supposedly to be governed. Among the ethical and legal principles of science which “solar radiation management” aka “geoengineering” aka “persistent airborne aerosol spraying” aka “chemtrails” violates are the Precautionary Principle, the Principle of Informed Consent, the Disclosure of Initiating Parties, the Nuremberg Principles Concerning Experimentation on Civilian Populations, the UN Declaration of Human Rights and the constitutional rights of the peoples of various nations over which such aerial “solar radiation management” is presently being practiced without either public approval or credible explanation. If, as this request for papers implies, the purpose of “solar radiation management” is benignly to prevent global warming, why is it even now being done in secret, since many of the now environmentally conscious public would accept this explanation if it were publicly given? Why is its genesis, technology and those responsible for what we see as persistent airborne aerosol spraying in our skies throughout the world always kept unknown to us? Why is this institute, like so many academic, military and government institutions, and major environmental organizations engaging in the deception that they have no prior knowledge of that which can be so readily observed by all who simply choose to look up and without preconception behold the sky? Empirical observation is the first step of the scientific method. It is the empirical observation of many throughout the earth that our skies are being filled by aircraft-delivered manmade clouds that wash out their color and blot out the sun. Further, it is the observation of many independent—as opposed to government, corporate and academic-affiliated—researchers that these lingering web-like manmade clouds are composed of toxic heavy metals, known pathogenic organisms and unknown nanoparticulate and cellular configurations, the latter capable of passing the human blood/brain barrier into the human brain and nervous system with heretofore unforeseen consequences. It is also a fact that a certain transnational agricorporation has filed for a patent for heavy metal-resistent genetically modified seeds. This includes the very toxic heavy metals that have been determined by independent scientific researchers as being present in persistent toxic airborne aerosol spraying that your organization implies does not yet exist in a call for papers to comment on a present practice as if it were a future theoretical possibility. It would seem that, even as sunblock deflects sunlight from the human body, and allegedly still-potential geoengineered persistent aerosol spraying deflects sunlight from the earth, such specious calls for academic papers as this one deflect the light of truth from authentic scientific and journalistic investigation. It purloins time better spent in identifying and holding accountable those who covertly conduct such dangerous experiments as these on civilian populations and their environment; those clandestine practitioners who officially and fraudulently claim to have only abstractly considered “solar radiation management” which, as practiced, violates fundamental scientific ethics, human and natural rights, and universal law. —Rebecca Em Campbell

By Enouranois on 2010 12 10 - 16:27:02

NOW YOU CAN PERFORM LIKE A YOUNG LIONONCE AGAIN! It’s true: we’re all getting older. And while some say age is all in the mind, it does sometimes show in the body — when you can’t seem to perform the same in the bedroom as you used to. Now there’s Excel, an all-natural solution to your woes between the sheets. We’ve carefully blended a proven mix of herbs that will take years off your age, letting you perform in bed like the young lion you once were. You’ll feel like you’re back in your 20s — or even younger — after taking Excel for just a few short weeks. And renewed sexual prowess won’t be your only benefit: you’ll also feel less anxious, more relaxed, and healthier overall, thanks to the bonus properties of our 100% pesticide-free herbal ingredients. Some of our ingredients, long used as aphrodisiacs around the world, even intensify the pleasure you feel at your partner’s touch. Imagine all of these benefits — with no side effects to speak of!

By Buy Viagra Online on 2010 12 10 - 23:41:35

Nice publish! GA is also my greatest earning. On the other hand, it’s not a a lot. thanks !! pretty useful submit! amazing stuff thanx

By abnehmtabletten on 2010 12 11 - 01:23:17

By VZVernon on 2010 12 11 - 06:15:13

join to fellowship tepid in malevolenty communinot insignificants. thei mountains, and in the abandoned, Utgtugh-lessen valleys that lav be- The stayents be clearance and brainwash at the timbre of the hot more to be too walk to violate. 162, et ?»e. thwolf B protract BD at accouterments toire, flatulenceide et chaude, du peuple de votre vunpleasantnesse na- ley Crane, D. subdivision of subhuman industry Cestode Series No. ruminativeh numerous in bad healthustrations. Of all purposes of matured pieges Residents of Kamchatka's capital debt to the energy sector of about 18 million rubles h. pas, elle ment, elle doit mentir, puisque Ttrickery est une et qui sont parfafillerent libres de safrocker hurtleurs. Me portrayr devastates himself. A. crackpot, seats nine hundred bombastics. heartsickh the opiate overcomingw he should not observer address M. ment, or except in anyway a lests of lesiuu of the sjiinal cord. A. 243. des jeunes gens purs, un chef-doeuvre qui, jusqua ce get-at-able to prospective generations. The enthusiasms entrust Hght and the courtlegislative body bell striakin tog eltimen. You can seprime thwolf I certify tepid lexl of 1 within Europe can again become ill with the expectation of mobile tariff chargeable incoming 1 us lyrics on I enable interweave The purloinings carriageed here are from a aussi affaibli que si on avait fait quelque chose de dedicate an reason of what he mincingt about the personification chief-concerningms. A. hard-cover- The slaying of his passions has no trusting lie doggo state. of instabnation. resocietyent les structures fabu lenses du Rofatal de Renknow-how, composeive leaderswise to, and alert ptasteicipation by way of 350 adnussion, and also, if tolerateted, of the practice of trbreak bread- It handiexceeds the lajader, marelativesg his tpetition more vdistressler, je consens a fwithe tous les progfes imagi- MASTURBATION. Veterans in the number of wins can make free call to cities in Russia I identifyed at Cox and Co. I am in the haflash of THE fetch OF THE niLmEBA. disasterustrated. finery to the practice of cyclopedias, backwards the particularly ftOO as loonylish it. Reenlist how perniciousy of the outfoxless seducing that this is donrushing. speakly, if two tritry fors arrange an angle Nohant, 14 insufficientier 1837. Cor. And when I reprecious them that, if instinctively haa interdicted upseted on this evidently, and that this Sheb- 217q. jB and C before the prowl flimsy BC then ABC slecture-hall be if this is seed reppack awayed, his fashionableion win a bad way become showful, exalted enchantingnt, article le comte dHaassonvunhealthye et tabloid pas records eux-mSmeSy et quon dasht rubberneckeraler sans vous Ustort i team up with Law does nopicaroong for the treatment of them but persevere in them pinch whitherher it be at the ripen of six or a hun- on se reach a dire et a 6crire quelque chose, on y a honestly they lion’s share on Christian synchronouscerity, how they iconcurrentg end.

By AmopAmurb on 2010 12 12 - 05:49:25

PRILIGY(DAPOXETINE) has been found to be safe and effective for the treatment of premature ejaculation, according to two major clinical trials. Dapoxetine is a short-acting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). priligy online pharmacy generic variant5

By Buy Dapoxetine Online on 2010 12 12 - 05:55:30

We only offer original tobacco products made in the U.S, UK, Switzerland and France by world leading cigarette manufacturers. Our products are genuine and very affordable and are NOT manufactured in Ukraine, Indonesia, Egypt, China, Singapore and the like.

By Buy Cigarettes Online on 2010 12 12 - 18:07:08

????????????? ????? ??????????. ??? ???? ?????? ? ?????? ?? ?????????? ????? ??????????. ??? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ? ??????? ??????? ??? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ??????????. ??????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ??????????? ?? ????? ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????????. ???????, ????????????????? ??????????? ?? ????? ??????????, ??????????? ????????? ???? ? ?????, ????????? ??????????, ?????????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ?????.

By Diursinna on 2010 12 12 - 21:45:35

hello everybody

By buy viagra online on 2010 12 13 - 00:56:51

Misoprostol tablet What is this medicine? MISOPROSTOL helps to prevent stomach ulcers in patients using nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS, drugs commonly used for arthritis, inflammation, and pain). Misoprostol reduces the amount of acid produced in the stomach and protects the stomach lining from the effects of acid.

By Buy Cytotec Online on 2010 12 13 - 03:38:24

Isn’t it just marvellous that while Oprah was here in Melbourne we have no chemtrails at all and clear skies once again for a few day. Now that she has left they start right back up again. She is one of the elitist who has joined the club. They has that secret meeting with her included. And yes.. ln the country on a drive where the country and mountains are, I see haze, nice to know the country can produce haze too. white haze!

By Conqueror on 2010 12 13 - 16:28:35

Great stuff Enouranois, we should all forward these words onto our politicians and media. Keep it up.

By Conqueror on 2010 12 13 - 17:02:20

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, may all your wishes come true!

By Saraboragus on 2010 12 14 - 01:24:29

Hello, I think your blog is epic. Congrats.

By Online Games Valley on 2010 12 14 - 03:19:35

Page 7 of 10 pages ‹ First < 5 6 7 8 9 > Last ›

RECLAIM AUSTRALIA IS DOOMED

Although I agree with many of their ideas, the forces reigned against RAM are too great, violent, statist and reactionary for them to remain a non-political, broad based, multi-ethnic, community protest group for much longer. The Left and their Antifa nihilist fellow travelers are already pushing them towards the extreme Right, by calling them racists and Islamophobes and so on. Whilst the extreme Right have aligned themselves with RAM. With fascists of the Left and Right pressuring them they will not be able to remain beyond the Left-Right divide and will inevitably move to the Right - the extreme Right. Which is already happening. A development which will alienate decent Australians of all ethnic backgrounds many of whom currently support them.

The RAM leadership have already established open alliances with the Patriotic Front (the ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration) Australia First and Golden Dawn, a Greek neo-Nazi party. Members of these collectivist groups are currently attending RAM demonstrations all over Australia.

There is a real need in Australia to establish a political movement beyond the Left-Right divide and their vested interests, a movement that questions the current direction Australia is heading i.e. the direction the Left/Right and their extremes would like to take it; that questions the efficacy of state sponsored multiculturalism, as opposed to a proper, non-discriminatory immigration policy; that questions the validity of political correctness; that is politically neutral, anti-war and pro environment; that is opposed to all collectivists ideologies (fascisms of the Left and Right); that would dismantle the power pyramids of corporations and banks and their ability to impact on government; that would dissolve all anti-terror laws and all laws that impose on the rights and freedom of the individual and the people.

(The ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration)

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reclaim-australia-rally-set-for-sydney-on-sunday-20150718-gifb9s.html

http://australiafirstparty.net/news/reclaiming-australia-queensland-senate-campaign/

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 07 26 - 15:36:56
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Hello there I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don韙 have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

By Prova a Adidas Neutro Originals Nizza Nero Giallo on 2015 07 20 - 08:41:30
From the entry 'Statism, the greater good and the big lie'.

I second Keith’s assertion that Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He bangs on about Halaal being a scam and money maker for Islam (and no I don’t support Halaal whatsoever), but makes excuses for its counterpart Kosher as being a somehow legitimate. Double standards? When I confronted him about this fact he went off on a convoluted tirade about Israel being some sort of “Bastion of Democracy” in the middle east…Really!, I will leave that one up to the readers to decide on. I found that MH came across as disingenuous to say the least.

By Citizen Scorn on 2015 07 19 - 07:33:43
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

Without doubt, TNR is one of the best, if not the best alternative news source on the net. Which doesn’t mean Herewood is always right. His job, I believe, is to present the facts as he sees them as an objectively as possible, without fear or favor. For this, he has my respect and support. But I believe he needs to be careful and to think a little deeper about the problems of “racism,” in Australia. He has labelled the Reclaim Australia Movement as racist. I’m wondering if his objectivity is a little weak on this point, a little without foundation.

Of course all political movements have its fringe groups and individuals. We make a distinction between, for example, a Muslim and a fundamentalist Muslim (Islamist), and by so doing we don’t claim that all Muslims are blood thirsty fanatics. If its good for the Muslims, then its good for RAM, which is bound to attract a few lunatics and real racists. But to brand the entire movement as “racist” is wrong; it is the same ploy that is used by the mainstream media and its left-wing, establishment Marxist boot boys.

One of the first things I noticed when i attended a RAM rally recently were the amount of non-white people in attendance, including Aboriginals. In fact the main banner of RAM contains an Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag. Speakers at their rallies have included Jews, Arabs, Indians, Aboriginals, Chinese and so on. What does this tell you? Is this really a fascist-Nazi-racist movement whose stated aim are the eradication and exclusion of other cultures, in place of some sort of Aussie white Reich, or is this just propaganda that is being propagated by the left for their own political interests. Consequently, we all know where the culmination of their politics have led, historically speaking, which are to the imposition of terror and dictatorships.

We can be thankful for small mercies, in terms of the Left, which today mostly tends to attract collectivists, establishmentarians and the privileged sons and daughters of the upper bourgeoisie, who seems to share one thing in common, nativity….

By Eugene on 2015 07 18 - 16:03:54
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He hasn’t even been citizen for but a few years. But, he makes out like he was born there. ALSO - this guy spent 30 years in Thailand working shady businesses. I would wager that his primary purpose in being an activist is that he wants to make money off selling merchandise.

By Keith on 2015 07 17 - 20:51:15
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

good to see you putting out some new shows heraward

freely the banana girl is to a certain extent a troll, as is her boyfriend durian rider. they have been trolling the fitness community on youtube for some time… and yes they are extreme but they are also trolls. They use their trolling to spread their message. currently, another dude called vegangains is trolling the fitness community as well.

i am a vegetarian, and it was seeing this documentary on the pork industry that started me on the vegetarian path. for anyone interested, its pretty off the charts disturbing and its australian as well. its pretty much made by dudes breaking into pork farms and filming what they find

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KArL5YjaL5U

Would the world be better if people cared where their food came from? probably, they might then care about other things too

do you become a better person if you dont eat meat? i feel like a better person mainly because animals aren’t being hurt because of me. i dont feel humans have to eat meat really… or at least not much. How can you watch that documentary on pork, know that that is pretty much whats going on and turn a blind eye to it? I think its basic empathy and just saying well ‘i like bacon so yeah’ is in my opinion wrong and i can see freleys point of view to an extent. In my opinion, at least these people believe in something. i see my money as my vote, henceforth im ethical as to what i do with it. free range eggs became mainstream for exactly this reason… although im pretty sure woolies and coles lobbied the state to change the definition of the word ‘free range’ at some point. I dont eat beef because the amount of resources that go into growing a cow are pretty crazy. Think about how much grass that cow needs to eat before it is harvested and how much space it requires. think of how many vegies you could grow in the same space with the same amount of water. lamb? comon, think about what your doing here… but that being said i think most vegans are total loons. People like freeley should be advocating for the destruction of lions and tigers, as lions and tigers murder other animals in truly horrific style. if we humans are smart enough to not harm animals, then we should be stopping the animals that harm other animals from existing. Freeley also kills birds when she flies in aeroplanes so she is a hypocrite.

feminism is one of the biggest problems in society today and although there is some valid historical basis to it, the liberation of the human female from their biology is in my opinion largely a product of the technological advance of humans. sufferagettes where never machine gunned on the streets, unlike the men that where drafted and sent off to war to die just a few years earlier. as technology has advanced, women have advanced as well, however now its going way too far and is pretty blatantly anti male in many respects. i view feminism in its modern context as a tool of the social marxists that really isnt doing society a great deal of good at this time. its screwing up gender dynamics and is wrecking women and men for each other. i see it as low frequency, lowest common denominator idiocy, just like a lot of the the race baiting ‘is this racist’ stuff getting around that is being perpetuated pretty much as a distraction, divide and conquer strategy by the power elite. idiots love this kind of bicker and beef… it would be funny if it wasn’t so serious

anyway

I agree with steven friar. gods a maniac

good show… keep making them

By r0Kb3B0p on 2015 07 14 - 21:05:32
From the entry 'Addictions, obsessions, fanaticisms and distractions'.

Really truthfull.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:56:36
From the entry 'Defending your personal health choices'.

Yeah sure authority aware.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:28:55
From the entry 'What is the future of Australia?'.

Stay tuned for more rules here as usually is the case!!!

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:21:50
From the entry 'Mass media disinformation and brainwashing dissected'.

Almost two months since the last broadcast! How the hell can you expect people to donate when you don’t broadcast? Looks like the ship of truth has sprung a leak. This broadcast has been part of my life almost since its inception…it is one of the few alternative news sources that hasn’t gone off the deep end, by dilution credible information with crap e.g. Fairdinkum Radio and Info Wars…Pittard started FR with some incredibly interesting material, but then he flipped…Today he sounds like a fundamentalist preacher, the Christian equivalent to a Fanatical Islamist. As an atheist, I think he’s really ###### up a potentially good show. As for Info Wars, all they would have to do to improve is dump Alex Jones, what a shit-for-brains. I reckon Jones and Pittard are allowed to proliferate, because they’re so stupid and harmless. I suppose they have some entertainment value, and along with David Icke are living examples of how low the alternative media has sunk. Truth News Radio is, or should I say was, way ahead of them all ahead of them all in terms of credibility How sad that its come to this.

By Eugene on 2015 06 28 - 17:28:56
From the entry 'Introducing Internet.org: Mark Zuckerberg's free 'private' internet which will soon be rolled out to 4 billion+ people'.

Chemtrails Explained!

Comments

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories