Truth News Australia

Hereward Fenton

LATEST SHOW
Update on Assange, Bitcoin and abortion law Get the podcast »

Contrails dissipate quickly whereas chemtrails linger?

13 May 2012
0 Comments

By Hereward Fenton

Categories: [ Chemtrails ]

Contrails over London in 1944

Vapour trails left by British bombers on route to attack flying-bomb sites encircle the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral. London, 1944.

All those who passionately believe that "contrails dissipate quickly" whereas "chemtrails linger" and are deeply offended by the sceptical position that TNRA takes in regard to these claims, are free to "unlike" Truth News.

If, on the other hand, you would like to engage in rational debate, you're most welcome to do so.

However, please be advised that the information I have to impart may be shocking and difficult to grasp if you have been a "chemtrail alarmist" for a long time.

The often cited claim that "normal contrails dissipate quickly" is total bunkum.

There is not a shred of science to backup that claim.  Nothing, nada, zippo!

Those who promote this idea are simply repeating something they read on a web page without checking sources.


 

CONTRAIL SCIENCE

For a contrail to form, suitable conditions must occur immediately behind a jet engine in the expanding engine exhaust plume. A contrail will form if, as the exhaust gases cool and mix with surrounding air, the humidity becomes high enough (or, equivalently, the air temperature becomes low enough) for liquid water to condense on particles and form liquid droplets. If the local air is cold enough, these newly formed droplets then freeze and form ice particles that make up a contrail.

Because the basic processes are very well understood, contrail formation for a given aircraft flight can be accurately predicted if atmospheric temperature and humidity conditions are known.

After the initial formation of ice, a contrail evolves in one of two ways. If the humidity is low, the contrail will be short-lived. Newly formed ice particles will quickly evaporate. The resulting contrail will extend only a short distance behind the aircraft. If the humidity is high, the contrail will be persistent. Newly formed ice particles will continue to grow in size by taking water from the surrounding atmosphere. The resulting line-shaped contrail extends for large distances behind an aircraft. Persistent contrails can last for hours while growing to several kilometers in width and 200 to 400 meters in height. Contrails spread because of air turbulence created by the passage of aircraft, differences in wind speed along the flight track, and possibly through effects of solar heating.

Thus, the surrounding atmosphere’s conditions determine to a large extent whether or not a contrail will form after an aircraft’s passage, and how it evolves. Other factors that influence contrail formation include engine fuel efficiency, which affects the amount of heat and water emitted in the exhaust plume.
- source

TNRA is informed by science and is not interested in propping up anyone's belief systems, and we don't apologise for that.

But, please, don't take it from me, speak to any meteorologist or any pilot and they'll tell you straight, that there is HUGE variation in the length and persistence of contrails. Sometimes they don't form at all, other times they form, but disspate quickly, other times they persist and spread out.

That's the facts folks, and it's been that way since planes first went up in the sky.

If you believe otherwise, I'm afraid you've been conned.

Forgive me if I seem rude or impatient on this topic, but every few months I come across a new wave of people who have been subjected to the same false propaganda about chemtrails, and I have to run the same arguments and cite the same articles over and over again. It does wear one's patience down.

Before making some kind of angry reply, I urge you to read this article and associated links. It's fairly detailed, and deals with most of the usual claims made by chemtrail alarmists.

Finally, let me qualify all this by saying that I do not doubt that geo-engineering programs exist, and that, indeed, some of the patented techniques discussed at international forums  include the creation of artificial cirrus cloud. Does this, however, entitle you to conclude that every spreading contrail you see is an example of such geo-engineering?

Think about it.

Related Links

Comments

Please review the Terms of Service before reading or responding to comments.

Wayne, as I responded to you privately, my questions are rhetoric and are in reality reasons why Chemtrails do not exist.

Therefore I am not interested in debating the question of chemtrails as applied to commercial airlines because if they DO exist as described by the theory, after 17 years of flying inside these supposed chemtrails, I should be dead of heavy metal, barium, strontium poisoning; or or at the very least, heavily afflicted with the nebulous “Morgellons” disease.

I am not.

Neither is any other pilot or flight attendant or frequent flyer I know.

This is where the reality diverges from the theory.

Now if you can supply practical answers to my questions, even though they are rhetoric, I will listen.

To anyone here who believes that commercial airlines are not involved in chemtrailing, but also believes that any persistent contrail must be a chemtrail, be advised that the A330’s I fly regularly emit persistent contrails. Therefore according to your theory, I am involved in Chemtrailing. You cannot have it both ways.

By Mike Glynn on 2012 07 08 - 08:56:58

I have noted the various responses to the question of contrails v. chemtrails over the last few weeks. Interesting to say the least. I am not in the least interested in arguing with anybody. All I am doing is stating facts as I know them. Prior to commencing my flying career of over 48 years, I was an aircraft maintenance engineer. I believe there are contrails and there are chemtrails which are put about by governments for nefarious purposes. I do not believe that there are any chemtrails made by commercial aircraft as it is not possible to contaminate the fuel with the kind of chemicals used and it certainly could not be done in secret as engineers and pilots know their respective aircraft intimately and no equipment required would escape notice.

The various claims made about “persistent” and “spreading” contrails are quite laughable in the very least and preposterous at most. Given the right ambient conditions for contrails to form, it is just not feasible that an aircraft of any size could make such a difference to the surrounding atmosphere, with its minuscule input of water from fuel, and minuscule heating of the air passing through its engine/s to make any appreciable difference to the parcel of air it is moving through to effect the surrounding atmosphere to the extent that it creates cloud. It is just dream-time stuff and not within the realms of the laws of physics. The ice formed by condensing water vapour emitted from exhausts simply mixes with the more dominant surrounding atmosphere and is absorbed into the surrounding temperature/humidity continuum and the effect of the engine/s on the air parcel is neutralised by the mixing.

To believe that an aircraft engine, or engines, can have such an effect on a large parcel of air as to make cloud reeks of fanciful reasoning. I have made contrails and flown through my colleagues contrails and watched them disappear in line with what the ambient conditions dictate. I have never seen “persistent” contrails.

For those who wish to argue that there are no such things as chemtrails please do so, but science does not, as far as I can determine, support such theories. Quite apart from this, the German and US governments have admitted that they make chemtrails for weather control purposes and a little research tells us that geo-engineering for weather control is facilitated by the chemtrails in combination with the now 7 HAARP stations across the globe. Cheers.

By Leonard Clampett on 2012 07 08 - 11:10:52

I already told Mike Glynn privately what my preconditions are for embarking on discussion with him, and he does not intend to meet them, and does not care about the fact that he does not. He also provided this interesting information:

“I have joined a Facebook group that is suing over Geo-Engineering and Chemtrails. Not because I believe for a second that they will be successful, but because I wish to see an end to this as I believe that if it continues to gather steam then pilots and aircraft will be placed in danger by extremists. By advising them on aviation matters for the lawsuit I can assist in the ending of this question. Search for Chemtrail and Geo-Engineering lawsuit on Facebook. The owner of that group, Robert Forgette will vouch for me.”

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 08 - 11:43:04

Leonard, you say that you do not believe commercial aircraft are involved in chemtrailing, yet I can show you many videos of verifiable commercial jets making persistent contrails. I can show you a video of Julia Gillards VIP aircraft doing the same over Melbourne. So those are persistent contrails and not chemtrails. If so, why?

You post reveals you know little about the amount of water created by jet fuel combustion. The ratio of water created to fuel burnt is 3-1. That’s right, you burn a tonne of Jet A1 then you create 3 tonnes of water… More than enough to create a persistent contrail in a saturated atmosphere. Check the science if you do not believe me.

By Michael Glynn on 2012 07 08 - 15:19:29

I would like to invite Michael Glynn on our show for an interview, and if both parties agree, I would like to also invite Leonard Clampett on to advance the chemtrails argument. Please contact me via the website if you are interested.

Thanks for your contributions.

By Hereward Fenton on 2012 07 08 - 15:49:37

FYI: I am the admin and host of the radio show

By Hereward Fenton on 2012 07 08 - 15:51:10

Hereward, my roster permitting, I would be delighted.

By Michael Glynn on 2012 07 08 - 16:17:45

Great! Our show broadcasts live in the US on Wednesdays at 8:00PM EDT - if that time does not work for you we can pre-record.

By Hereward Fenton on 2012 07 08 - 16:21:44

Join in the largest stand ever against chemtrails.

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/peaceinspace/2012/06/join-in-.html

By Leonard Clampett on 2012 07 08 - 19:09:58

To Michael Glynn,

Claiming that burning Avtur or JetA1 produces water in amounts far exceeding the capacity to do so is fairy floss in the land of physics. However, I am not arguing with you over that as it would be insane to do so. It baffles me how you can make such a claim that burning a tonne of fuel produces 3 tonnes of water. I would have thought that, with your professed expertise, you would be skilled in the use of water detection paste which is used every time fuel is added to any turbine fuel tank to ensure there is no water present in amounts that would cause combustion problems. A Boeing 747 burns about 5 tonnes of fuel per hour. Going on your claim that means there is 15 tonnes of water being exhausted from four engines combined every hour. Where does that water come from? From an engineering viewpoint it is not possible.

Cheers,

By Leonard Clampett on 2012 07 08 - 19:24:14

Leonard, the water, along with CO2 and a few other gases is created by the combustion process. In fact the amount of CO2 produced is more than 3 times the weight of fuel consumed. Look it up if you don’t believe me.

Also, a 747 burns approximately 12 tonnes per hour when heavy, reducing to a tad under 10 when it lightens.

By Michael Glynn on 2012 07 08 - 19:59:22

If Leonard Clampett’s stance represents a refusal to appear on Hereward Fenton’s radio show I congratulate him on adopting it.

Like the Protestant Reformation in its stance against the Catholic priesthood, civil society must today emancipate itself from commecial journalists, the commercial media and other would be mediators.
http://epamaegina.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/independent-citizens-assembly/

I hope that Michael Glynn ends up talking to himself, or to Hereward Fenton.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 08 - 21:35:46

Leonard Clampett,

I am amazed that, as a former aircraft mechanic, you do not seem to have learned about fuel combustion.

Here is the formula (balanced equation) for kerosene combustion:
2 C12H26 + 37 O2—> 12 CO2 + 13 H2O

If you are wondering about the “miraculous” increase of mass, have a look at the 37 O2. That’s the amount of oxygen needed for combustion. It is taken from the environmental air.

By Josh on 2012 07 08 - 22:37:24

Checking out Robert Forgette                         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t66YhAiofIk

He is on the opposite side of the argument to Michael Glynn. Making Michael Glynn’s references to him inscrutable to me. I wonder if Michael Glynn will be following Robert Forgette to the “new site” that Mr. Forgette tells us about.

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 08 - 22:37:55

Wayne Hall,

do you realize that you are confusing even chemtrail believers with your stance?

By the way, I have read the paper you linked - nothing in it about chemtrails. Everthing this watchdog group is referring to is “discussed”, “suggested”, “proposed” or “intended”. They mention the well known sulfur proposal (the artificial volcano eruption) and that’s it. Not a word about jet trails.
Is that your much-advertised “different level”??

I think it’s time that you step down from your “elite” socket and join the discussion with us plebeians.

If you further refuse to make your point about chemtrails, then I’m afraid it is you who will be ignored for sheer single-mindedness ...

By Josh on 2012 07 08 - 23:17:45

I made it perfectly clear what the orientation of the ETC Group is to geoengineering and told you what I thought the reasons were for that.  I invited both you and Michael Glynn to contact them and ask them if they thought the moratorium on geoengineering was being implemented. Neither of you has agreed to do so, or even try, despite the fact that - as I said - I am taking a risk making this proposal to you for the reasons you yourself just indicated. They may tell you something very different from what I would say and what I believe. 

Your declining to do as I request indicates that you are willing to talk only to the uninitiated and the know-nothings on this subject.

By the way, here is one of the videos that Michael Glynn recommended:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tCGHLOLYnw&feature=plcps

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 08 - 23:38:53

Wayne,

While Leonard sorts out his combustion equations, a quiet word. Robert Forgette knows I do not believe in chemtrails. That entire group knows because I told them all. My entire involvement in this debate is spurred by a fear, based on an increasing number of public threats to pilots and aircraft that I have witnessed, that some extremists will soon take direct action that will result in a tragedy.

That group wishes to take the issue to a court of law. This seems to be a better way to settle the question than mindless abuse on various forums, so I have volunteered to act as an aviation adviser to them. Robert agreed and so far the arrangement is working well. There are numerous hoax videos around that I have advised them to disregard. A plan to launch a sampling rocket in order to obtain a chemtrail sample, was advised against. I don’t argue with them, just advise on aviation.

Can I say that your insistence, on a thread devoted to discussing the differences between contrails and chemtrails, that I contact some fringe group regarding some watered down- non binding moratorium on Geo Engineering to ascertain whether or not it is being upheld, is baffling at the very least. In the context of the thread, who cares???

You insistence that others follow your red herring before you will debate them reveals a narcissistic personality trait. Good luck with that…

By Michael Glynn on 2012 07 09 - 04:38:10

To say it for the umpteenth time: I think the contrails versus chemtrails debate is the LAST way to understand anything about what is happening, and what is being proposed.

To judge from his video, Robert Forgette is having some problems with his group and is working on To say it for the umpteenth time: I think the contrails versus chemtrails debate is the LAST way to understand anything about what is happening, and what is being proposed.

To judge from his video, Robert Forgette is having some problems with his group and is working on a strategy for weeding out people he regards as not helping with his objectives.

If you asked me to try to contact him to cross check what he says about you and your role in his group and what you yourself say (this is the equivalent of my proposing that you should contact ETC) I would do so. a strategy for weeding out people he regards as not helping with his objectives.

If you asked me to try to contact him to cross check what he says about you and your role in his group and what you yourself say (this is the equivalent of my proposing that you should contact ETC) I would do so. (Even though Robert is clearly a much more marginal person than the ETC people).

By Wayne Hall on 2012 07 09 - 05:05:27

The combustion process does nothing, in supplying the energy released from fuel burned, other than change compounds, elements and substances into their other forms. Any water contained in a parcel of air entering a combustion chamber is first reduced to steam, then a gas and then condenses as it is cooled post exhaust into visible water vapour i.e.contrail. So we are now told that a Boeing 747 with 4 engines takes in 36 tonnes of water along with its 12 tonnes of fuel and does what with it? I won’t argue with the claim as it is apparent that arguing with that is an exercise in nonsense. Add to that the claim that there is another 3 tonnes of CO2 being emitted I am wondering how all this is supposed to translate into “spreading” contrails, which do not exist to my knowledge and experience. All that is done when an aircraft passes by is the atmosphere is heated, then naturally cools to its pre-passage temperature and there is a very, very slight rise in the humidity of the air passed through as a very minuscule amount of water is exhausted from the combustion process.

By Leonard Clampett on 2012 07 09 - 05:35:49

Leonard,

The chemical equation given by Josh explains it all. Kerosene and ambient oxygen in=large amounts of water and CO2 out. That is basic science and not in dispute. So yes, a 747 flying in saturated air will tend to produce a large contrail which may persist, depending on the conditions.

The following video is from a fellow named Peter Kusznir, who is convinced that people like me are spraying people like him. He constantly films the Qantas flights to and from Johannesburg. These are aircraft I have several thousand hours personally flying. Therefore I tend to take what he says rather personally. What you will see is a 747 making a large persistent contrail.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7z8NRse1RQ&sns=em

On Peters channel, if you can stand the language, you will also see the video I referred to before; Julia Gillards VIP 737 from 34 Sqn RAAF doing the same thing. This gets Peter rather flummoxed as well it should. The PM of Australia… Or at least her personal aircraft, spraying her home town? Bad politics at least…. Or the story of the century if it was true. Fortunately for Julia, it isn’t.

Wayne, obviously the thread isn’t heading where you would wish. I suggest starting another one tentatively entitled “Discuss-Fringe group achieves non-enforceable moratorium on geo engineering related to bio diversity”.

By Mike Glynn on 2012 07 09 - 06:52:23

Page 4 of 55 pages ‹ First  < 2 3 4 5 6 >  Last ›

Listen Live

Recent Comments

RECLAIM AUSTRALIA IS DOOMED

Although I agree with many of their ideas, the forces reigned against RAM are too great, violent, statist and reactionary for them to remain a non-political, broad based, multi-ethnic, community protest group for much longer. The Left and their Antifa nihilist fellow travelers are already pushing them towards the extreme Right, by calling them racists and Islamophobes and so on. Whilst the extreme Right have aligned themselves with RAM. With fascists of the Left and Right pressuring them they will not be able to remain beyond the Left-Right divide and will inevitably move to the Right - the extreme Right. Which is already happening. A development which will alienate decent Australians of all ethnic backgrounds many of whom currently support them. 

The RAM leadership have already established open alliances with the Patriotic Front (the ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration) Australia First and Golden Dawn, a Greek neo-Nazi party. Members of these collectivist groups are currently attending RAM demonstrations all over Australia.

There is a real need in Australia to establish a political movement beyond the Left-Right divide and their vested interests, a movement that questions the current direction Australia is heading i.e. the direction the Left/Right and their extremes would like to take it; that questions the efficacy of state sponsored multiculturalism, as opposed to a proper, non-discriminatory immigration policy; that questions the validity of political correctness; that is politically neutral, anti-war and pro environment; that is opposed to all collectivists ideologies (fascisms of the Left and Right); that would dismantle the power pyramids of corporations and banks and their ability to impact on government; that would dissolve all anti-terror laws and all laws that impose on the rights and freedom of the individual and the people.   

(The ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration)

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reclaim-australia-rally-set-for-sydney-on-sunday-20150718-gifb9s.html

http://australiafirstparty.net/news/reclaiming-australia-queensland-senate-campaign/

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 07 26 - 15:36:56
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Hello there I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don韙 have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

By Prova a Adidas Neutro Originals Nizza Nero Giallo on 2015 07 20 - 08:41:30
From the entry 'Statism, the greater good and the big lie'.

I second Keith’s assertion that Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake.  He bangs on about Halaal being a scam and money maker for Islam (and no I don’t support Halaal whatsoever), but makes excuses for its counterpart Kosher as being a somehow legitimate.  Double standards?  When I confronted him about this fact he went off on a convoluted tirade about Israel being some sort of “Bastion of Democracy” in the middle east…Really!, I will leave that one up to the readers to decide on.  I found that MH came across as disingenuous to say the least.

By Citizen Scorn on 2015 07 19 - 07:33:43
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

Without doubt, TNR is one of the best, if not the best alternative news source on the net. Which doesn’t mean Herewood is always right. His job, I believe, is to present the facts as he sees them as an objectively as possible, without fear or favor.  For this, he has my respect and support. But I believe he needs to be careful and to think a little deeper about the problems of “racism,” in Australia. He has labelled the Reclaim Australia Movement as racist. I’m wondering if his objectivity is a little weak on this point, a little without foundation.

Of course all political movements have its fringe groups and individuals. We make a distinction between, for example, a Muslim and a fundamentalist Muslim (Islamist), and by so doing we don’t claim that all Muslims are blood thirsty fanatics. If its good for the Muslims, then its good for RAM, which is bound to attract a few lunatics and real racists. But to brand the entire movement as “racist” is wrong; it is the same ploy that is used by the mainstream media and its left-wing, establishment Marxist boot boys.

One of the first things I noticed when i attended a RAM rally recently were the amount of non-white people in attendance, including Aboriginals. In fact the main banner of RAM contains an Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag. Speakers at their rallies have included Jews, Arabs, Indians, Aboriginals, Chinese and so on. What does this tell you? Is this really a fascist-Nazi-racist movement whose stated aim are the eradication and exclusion of other cultures, in place of some sort of Aussie white Reich, or is this just propaganda that is being propagated by the left for their own political interests. Consequently, we all know where the culmination of their politics have led, historically speaking, which are to the imposition of terror and dictatorships.

We can be thankful for small mercies, in terms of the Left, which today mostly tends to attract collectivists, establishmentarians and the privileged sons and daughters of the upper bourgeoisie, who seems to share one thing in common, nativity….

By Eugene on 2015 07 18 - 16:03:54
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake.  He hasn’t even been citizen for but a few years.  But, he makes out like he was born there.  ALSO - this guy spent 30 years in Thailand working shady businesses.  I would wager that his primary purpose in being an activist is that he wants to make money off selling merchandise.

By Keith on 2015 07 17 - 20:51:15
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

good to see you putting out some new shows heraward

freely the banana girl is to a certain extent a troll, as is her boyfriend durian rider. they have been trolling the fitness community on youtube for some time… and yes they are extreme but they are also trolls. They use their trolling to spread their message. currently, another dude called vegangains is trolling the fitness community as well.

i am a vegetarian, and it was seeing this documentary on the pork industry that started me on the vegetarian path. for anyone interested, its pretty off the charts disturbing and its australian as well. its pretty much made by dudes breaking into pork farms and filming what they find

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KArL5YjaL5U

Would the world be better if people cared where their food came from? probably, they might then care about other things too

do you become a better person if you dont eat meat? i feel like a better person mainly because animals aren’t being hurt because of me. i dont feel humans have to eat meat really… or at least not much. How can you watch that documentary on pork, know that that is pretty much whats going on and turn a blind eye to it? I think its basic empathy and just saying well ‘i like bacon so yeah’ is in my opinion wrong and i can see freleys point of view to an extent. In my opinion, at least these people believe in something. i see my money as my vote, henceforth im ethical as to what i do with it. free range eggs became mainstream for exactly this reason… although im pretty sure woolies and coles lobbied the state to change the definition of the word ‘free range’ at some point. I dont eat beef because the amount of resources that go into growing a cow are pretty crazy. Think about how much grass that cow needs to eat before it is harvested and how much space it requires. think of how many vegies you could grow in the same space with the same amount of water. lamb? comon, think about what your doing here… but that being said i think most vegans are total loons. People like freeley should be advocating for the destruction of lions and tigers, as lions and tigers murder other animals in truly horrific style. if we humans are smart enough to not harm animals, then we should be stopping the animals that harm other animals from existing. Freeley also kills birds when she flies in aeroplanes so she is a hypocrite.

feminism is one of the biggest problems in society today and although there is some valid historical basis to it, the liberation of the human female from their biology is in my opinion largely a product of the technological advance of humans. sufferagettes where never machine gunned on the streets, unlike the men that where drafted and sent off to war to die just a few years earlier. as technology has advanced, women have advanced as well, however now its going way too far and is pretty blatantly anti male in many respects. i view feminism in its modern context as a tool of the social marxists that really isnt doing society a great deal of good at this time. its screwing up gender dynamics and is wrecking women and men for each other. i see it as low frequency, lowest common denominator idiocy, just like a lot of the the race baiting ‘is this racist’ stuff getting around that is being perpetuated pretty much as a distraction, divide and conquer strategy by the power elite. idiots love this kind of bicker and beef… it would be funny if it wasn’t so serious

anyway

I agree with steven friar. gods a maniac

good show… keep making them

By r0Kb3B0p on 2015 07 14 - 21:05:32
From the entry 'Addictions, obsessions, fanaticisms and distractions'.

Really truthfull.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:56:36
From the entry 'Defending your personal health choices'.

Yeah sure authority aware.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:28:55
From the entry 'What is the future of Australia?'.

Stay tuned for more rules here as usually is the case!!!

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:21:50
From the entry 'Mass media disinformation and brainwashing dissected'.

Almost two months since the last broadcast! How the hell can you expect people to donate when you don’t broadcast? Looks like the ship of truth has sprung a leak. This broadcast has been part of my life almost since its inception…it is one of the few alternative news sources that hasn’t gone off the deep end, by dilution credible information with crap e.g. Fairdinkum Radio and Info Wars…Pittard started FR with some incredibly interesting material, but then he flipped…Today he sounds like a fundamentalist preacher, the Christian equivalent to a Fanatical Islamist. As an atheist, I think he’s really ###### up a potentially good show. As for Info Wars, all they would have to do to improve is dump Alex Jones, what a shit-for-brains. I reckon Jones and Pittard are allowed to proliferate, because they’re so stupid and harmless. I suppose they have some entertainment value, and along with David Icke are living examples of how low the alternative media has sunk. Truth News Radio is, or should I say was, way ahead of them all ahead of them all in terms of credibility How sad that its come to this.

By Eugene on 2015 06 28 - 17:28:56
From the entry 'Introducing Internet.org: Mark Zuckerberg's free 'private' internet which will soon be rolled out to 4 billion+ people'.

Categories