Richard Gage AIA speaks on worldwide press conference

February 21, 2010, part 1 of 1.
Download mp3 » click here

On 19 February 2010 a press conference was held concurrently in 19 states, 3 continents, 6 countries, 38 cities and 48 locations, as more than 1,000 architects and engineers worldwide now support the call for a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Ae911truth.org press release

The Sydney press conference (pictured above) was held outside St Mary's Cathedral.

On today's show Richard Gage AIA, founding member of Ae911truth.org, joins us to discuss all matters pertaining to the the 9/11 truth movement and the growing demand for a truly independent, subpoena powered investigation.

As of the date of posting, 1046 registered architects and engineers have now signed the petition.

In the second half of the show we bring you the audio from the Sydney press conference and a recent TV interview with NYC CAN Outreach Director Manny Badillo.

Comments

Please review the Terms of Service before reading or responding to comments.

Excellent idea How many people came?

By Matt on 2010 02 22 - 09:19:30

How many members of the press came? ZERO… seriously..do you think the press buy’s this douche-bags lies?

By Dora on 2010 02 23 - 03:12:36

Yeah, great media turnout. Lol! For the truth, and not the paranoid, delusional nonsense of this lot, try; www.911myths.com http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/

By pjw on 2010 02 23 - 03:44:46

Dora, you are obviously anti-science. Are you are member of the Creationism Museum too? The laws of physics ptoves controlled demolitioThis really isn’t that difficult to understand. Simple science proves the inside job aspect of 9/11. Both WTC towers fell at near ‘freefall acceleration’. Freefall acceleration is described as the time it would take to drop an object a given distance until it reaches the ground with only gravity as the downward force. Ex: the time it would take to drop a baseball off the top of one of the 110 storey World Trade Center buildings until it hit the street below with only air as the resistant force. (About 9.2 seconds.) Therefore, as each tower collapsed, how is it physically possible for them to collapse at this speed with all of the massive steel and concrete support structure below giving NO RESISTANCE? Also, what was the energy force that caused massive multi-ton steel support columns to be ejected laterally outward up to 600 feet embedding them into nearby buildings? What was the energy force that caused all of the concrete to be pulverized into a fine powder covering all of lower Manhattan? The Physics Law of Conservation of Momentum does not allow for this. You can’t have it both ways. If the Official Government Conspiracy Theory claims that the weight of the part of the building above the plane impact area crushed the lower structure how can it also have the energy to eject the steel outward and pulverize the concrete too? Simple answer. It can’t. It’s simply science. The only way the three WTC buildings could fall at this rate is that the structure columns were being removed (demolished using explosives) as the buildings fell causing no resistance. The laws of physics don’t/can’t lie. Governments and their paid propagandists can and do.

By Cincy911Truth on 2010 02 23 - 05:32:35

“The laws of physics ptoves controlled demolitio” No, it did not. Go check out: http://www.911myths.com oh, and if you want to debate this, try: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/ But, we all know that will not happen. After all, why spoil a perfectly good fantasy?

By pjw on 2010 02 23 - 07:17:48

Dora you are a retard its simple really do no research and just baa like the good sheep you are

By will hale on 2010 02 23 - 07:39:03

poor old dora and pjw ... you have to feel sorry for these types… what are they doing here? it’s obvious, they are on a sunstein mission, exercising their crippled epistemology, attempting cognitive infiltration… they must feel important and empowered, defending the establishment, standing up for all those politicians who just can’t seem to muster any credibility for themselves… lucky the system has such capable agents working for it… hahaha

By John on 2010 02 23 - 15:39:10

No John, none of that. Just don’t like lies, misinformation, misquoting, ignoring evidence and taking things out of context. In other words, the stuff you truthers do. BTW, why not head over to screwloosechange.blogspot and debate the issue. But, we both know that ‘aint gonna happen. After all, why spoil a perfectly good fantasy?

By pjw on 2010 02 23 - 16:01:25

PJW - you are hereby challenged to come on TNRA using your real name and debate the 9/11 topic with us. There is nothing I would love more than to have the opportunity to prove how shallow and irrational the screwloosechange mob really are. I’m looking forward to it - please contact us ASAP to organise a date and time.

By Hereward on 2010 02 23 - 18:25:03

Dear Hereward, trolls and shills like pjw are here for a purpose… they don’t just happen upon the site and just happen to disagree… no, they have a mission, a mission to confuse and obstruct, to annoy, discourage and disrupt. It is important to deal with these types in a way that minimizes their impact and exposes their intent. Firstly, do not engage with them personally… they are not here to discuss or debate the issue, they cannot be swayed by logic or reason, there is nothing to be gained by responding to their provocations… in fact, responding to them gives them leverage, it encourages them. It is better to ignore them, they will go away once they realize their game is up. Do not engage them personally, but expose their nonsense, discuss their tactics, highlight their agenda ... don’t accuse anyone of being an agent, but announce the fact that agents are employed by govt to consciously and intentionally disrupt discussion of 9/11 ... if someone attacks, insults, ridicules, berates, harasses or intimidates anyone who questions the govt’s 9/11 conspiracy theory, if someone waffles on with absurd, irrelevant or confusing comments that add nothing to the discussion and serve only to annoy and disrupt, we can justifiably conclude that they’re here for hostile and perhaps more sinister purposes.

By John on 2010 02 24 - 08:38:38

Hey PJW only people like you refuse to familiarise themselves with both sides of an argument. Try refuting the contents of a better quality film like Blueprint for Truth or Zero. Or the historical fact of false flag operations occuring in the past. The reality is that you’re the one starting with pre-conceived notions. Also while I’m here, here is an article relevant to this discussion http://neithercorp.us/npress/?p=251. I keep seeing this one all the time 1) Make outrageous comments designed to distract or frustrate

By Mark on 2010 02 24 - 08:41:57

Hi Hereward, Good work getting another quality interview. Just a bit of constructive criticism. Your saying “indeed” a lot lately. Maybe try and use it less. I know i’m knit picking, but it does indeed detract from your good work.

By Craig Johnson on 2010 02 24 - 18:10:10

Yes ... indeed

By Hereward on 2010 02 24 - 18:55:48

“PJW - you are hereby challenged to come on TNRA using your real name and debate the 9/11 topic with us.” Amazing, eh. I asked this mob to why not debate this on SLC, and what do I get in reply? Evasion/ignoring my suggestion, and a demand that I use my real name, and appear on THEIR show. Talk about gutless. “There is nothing I would love more than to have the opportunity to prove how shallow and irrational the screwloosechange mob really are.” Really? Then, why haven’t I seen you there before? I mean, you just admitted you’d like ‘nothing more’ than to debate the people at screwloosechange, yet all you have to do is post a comment. Why haven’t you done that? What’s been holding you back? Can I have an answer to this, Hereward? Also, I have already been on your idiotic blog. Remember paul w? That was I. Remember, you banned me for foul language…after you lot stared with the abuse. Lol!!! Actually, I think it had more to do with the fact I kicked you arse on every idiotic points you made. What were they…oh yeah, did the pilots did not have the skill? “I’m looking forward to it - please contact us ASAP to organise a date and time.” Another demand. How surprising. Er, No. I’m not interested. But, it seems you are interested in proving the screwloosechange mob are ‘shallow’ and ‘irrational’, to quote you: “There is nothing I would love more than to have the opportunity to prove how shallow and irrational the screwloosechange mob really are.” Let’s see the verbal gymnastics as you wriggle out of this one. Because, let’s face it, we both know it ‘aint gonna happen. After all, why spoil a perfectly good fantasy? PS So, how many press turned up for the press release? Lol!!!

By pjw on 2010 02 25 - 05:13:40

Thanks for the invite, though. Anyway, it seems you’re pretty keen to kick SLC arse, so go for it: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/

By pjw on 2010 02 25 - 05:36:44

Sadly I don’t remember you Paul. In regard to your suggestion that I visit screwloosechange and debate there, I have a couple questions: 1) Are you an admin of that site? 2) Can you ensure that the debate is properly moderated? If the answer to either of those questions is not an emphatic “yes” then you have no place to be “offering” me to debate there - you are just a bystander with nothing at stake In my experience internet forums are not very good environments to debate such topics as they tend to get swamped by off-topic and ad-hominem rants. When I invited you to come on TNRA using your real name that was a genuine invitation by me as the admin of this website, with a guarantee that you would have the floor to make your points. This would give you a golden opportunity to put forth your point of view. So let’s be clear that you are turning down this offer, which is made in good faith. cheers Hereward

By Hereward on 2010 02 25 - 06:15:09

As I said, verbal gymnastics. Herewarth said, and I quote: “There is nothing I would love more than to have the opportunity to prove how shallow and irrational the screwloosechange mob really are.” Understand, dear reader, that the opportunity has been there all the time - all he had to do was post a comment. He’s obviously been looking at it, as it appears he know the SLC ‘mob’ well enough to consider them ‘shallow’ and ‘irrational’, yet has not posted a comment? And, why not? Because (please, try not to burst into laughter) he’ll get called names. That’s right. This man believes the US government murdered its own, and others, on 9-11, and god-knows what else, but he will not go and debate this on the internet because someone might call him names. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Well, Herearth, it’s a big world out there, and that will happen. You’re a man, are you not? So, deal with it. Both debunkers and truthers get called names, it’s the reality of free speech. More to the point, it is a sideshow to the main event; the reality of 9-11. And, in my opinion, you will not “get swamped by off-topic and ad-hominem rants” at SLC. Quite the opposite, in fact – you’ll be rigorously questioned on every ‘fact’ you raise. “When I invited you to come on TNRA using your real name that was a genuine invitation by me as the admin of this website, with a guarantee that you would have the floor to make your points.” Agreed. “This would give you a golden opportunity to put forth your point of view.” Yes, but the SLC site does it better. The written word is a far, far better debating forum than a radio show, as not one where can one spend time thinking about the reply, but posting the sources, as well. Also, others can join in. Why limit it to me? I have no desire to be on any radio show, truther or otherwise, but I am happy to debate in writing. I did so on your site for a few months. It’s one of the reasons why internet forums have taken off in such spectacular fashion. I am also wondering why is it that you, an admin of a website forum, is disregarding that very same medium for radio? I have the floor here, to make my points, and the floor at SLC can accommodate many more than one. Is that not a much better medium for a debate, Hereward, one where many minds can support your cause? “So let’s be clear that you are turning down this offer, which is made in good faith.” Who said it was not made it good faith? I did not, so why bring it up? “you are just a bystander with nothing at stake” Interesting to see how you view me. But, ‘nothing at stake’? 9-11 was the slaughter of thousands by a militant fundamentalist group, plus the terrorists have made it quite clear they will continue the wholesale murder until their demands are met. So, tell me; on what grounds do you say I have nothing at stake? Also, who are you to tell me who or what I can suggest in regard to SLC? I was answering the comment YOU made about the site, and it’s posters. I simply said, “Okay, do it. Go over there and debate.” You seem to want everything your way, Hereward. I demand this, I demand that…this will come as a shock, but not everyone has to play by your rules. This is not a kid’s sandpit, it’s the big world of adults. You made the claim, now back it up. You will find the SLC crowd ready, willing and able to debate. And, I’ll be one of them.

By pjw on 2010 02 25 - 12:51:40

“Yes, but the SLC site does it better. The written word is a far, far better debating forum than a radio show, as one can spend time thinking about the reply, but posting the sources, as well.”

By pjw on 2010 02 25 - 12:53:32

Well said, Hereward, you very cleverly exposed pjw for the poor lost soul that typically seeks attention in this childlike fashion… he obviously has no idea what he is talking about and is here simply to relieve his boredom… let’s hope it helps him, though i’d say the chance of that is slim at best.

By John on 2010 02 25 - 16:58:18

Dora, and other, are not worth debating as they are not here to debate, they are paid shills who are being paid money to sit around all day searching for places like this to inject propaganda, doubt and ridicule, The simple fact is there is no such thing as “Flying Pink Diabetic Antarctic Elephants” and I see these shills in that kind of way, if someone goes around saying “THERE ARE NO SUCH THING AS Flying Pink Diabetic Antarctic Elephants” in a very deliberate and passionate way, then it would be just sad. How are you Dora Different than this silly example. If the whole thing about 911truth is nothing, just paranoid ranting of mentally ill people then how sad is it for you to waste your time attacking them, you are and all the shills are pathetic, ignorant and would most likely sell you own child to the CPS, but i do respect you right to have an opinion even if it is one that is a lie in itself. (written while high, please excuse my inability to explain as well as i wanted to.) BLH

By TO DORA THE RETARD on 2010 02 25 - 21:19:06

Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 >

RECLAIM AUSTRALIA IS DOOMED

Although I agree with many of their ideas, the forces reigned against RAM are too great, violent, statist and reactionary for them to remain a non-political, broad based, multi-ethnic, community protest group for much longer. The Left and their Antifa nihilist fellow travelers are already pushing them towards the extreme Right, by calling them racists and Islamophobes and so on. Whilst the extreme Right have aligned themselves with RAM. With fascists of the Left and Right pressuring them they will not be able to remain beyond the Left-Right divide and will inevitably move to the Right - the extreme Right. Which is already happening. A development which will alienate decent Australians of all ethnic backgrounds many of whom currently support them.

The RAM leadership have already established open alliances with the Patriotic Front (the ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration) Australia First and Golden Dawn, a Greek neo-Nazi party. Members of these collectivist groups are currently attending RAM demonstrations all over Australia.

There is a real need in Australia to establish a political movement beyond the Left-Right divide and their vested interests, a movement that questions the current direction Australia is heading i.e. the direction the Left/Right and their extremes would like to take it; that questions the efficacy of state sponsored multiculturalism, as opposed to a proper, non-discriminatory immigration policy; that questions the validity of political correctness; that is politically neutral, anti-war and pro environment; that is opposed to all collectivists ideologies (fascisms of the Left and Right); that would dismantle the power pyramids of corporations and banks and their ability to impact on government; that would dissolve all anti-terror laws and all laws that impose on the rights and freedom of the individual and the people.

(The ape in the photograph is a Patriot Front supporter at a recent Richmond demonstration)

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/reclaim-australia-rally-set-for-sydney-on-sunday-20150718-gifb9s.html

http://australiafirstparty.net/news/reclaiming-australia-queensland-senate-campaign/

By Eugene Donnini on 2015 07 26 - 15:36:56
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Hello there I am so thrilled I found your web site, I really found you by error, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don韙 have time to go through it all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

By Prova a Adidas Neutro Originals Nizza Nero Giallo on 2015 07 20 - 08:41:30
From the entry 'Statism, the greater good and the big lie'.

I second Keith’s assertion that Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He bangs on about Halaal being a scam and money maker for Islam (and no I don’t support Halaal whatsoever), but makes excuses for its counterpart Kosher as being a somehow legitimate. Double standards? When I confronted him about this fact he went off on a convoluted tirade about Israel being some sort of “Bastion of Democracy” in the middle east…Really!, I will leave that one up to the readers to decide on. I found that MH came across as disingenuous to say the least.

By Citizen Scorn on 2015 07 19 - 07:33:43
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

Without doubt, TNR is one of the best, if not the best alternative news source on the net. Which doesn’t mean Herewood is always right. His job, I believe, is to present the facts as he sees them as an objectively as possible, without fear or favor. For this, he has my respect and support. But I believe he needs to be careful and to think a little deeper about the problems of “racism,” in Australia. He has labelled the Reclaim Australia Movement as racist. I’m wondering if his objectivity is a little weak on this point, a little without foundation.

Of course all political movements have its fringe groups and individuals. We make a distinction between, for example, a Muslim and a fundamentalist Muslim (Islamist), and by so doing we don’t claim that all Muslims are blood thirsty fanatics. If its good for the Muslims, then its good for RAM, which is bound to attract a few lunatics and real racists. But to brand the entire movement as “racist” is wrong; it is the same ploy that is used by the mainstream media and its left-wing, establishment Marxist boot boys.

One of the first things I noticed when i attended a RAM rally recently were the amount of non-white people in attendance, including Aboriginals. In fact the main banner of RAM contains an Australian flag and an Aboriginal flag. Speakers at their rallies have included Jews, Arabs, Indians, Aboriginals, Chinese and so on. What does this tell you? Is this really a fascist-Nazi-racist movement whose stated aim are the eradication and exclusion of other cultures, in place of some sort of Aussie white Reich, or is this just propaganda that is being propagated by the left for their own political interests. Consequently, we all know where the culmination of their politics have led, historically speaking, which are to the imposition of terror and dictatorships.

We can be thankful for small mercies, in terms of the Left, which today mostly tends to attract collectivists, establishmentarians and the privileged sons and daughters of the upper bourgeoisie, who seems to share one thing in common, nativity….

By Eugene on 2015 07 18 - 16:03:54
From the entry 'Dylann Roof: soldier in a new race war or just a pawn in the game?'.

Mike Holt from Restore Australia is very much a fake. He hasn’t even been citizen for but a few years. But, he makes out like he was born there. ALSO - this guy spent 30 years in Thailand working shady businesses. I would wager that his primary purpose in being an activist is that he wants to make money off selling merchandise.

By Keith on 2015 07 17 - 20:51:15
From the entry 'Restore Australia!'.

good to see you putting out some new shows heraward

freely the banana girl is to a certain extent a troll, as is her boyfriend durian rider. they have been trolling the fitness community on youtube for some time… and yes they are extreme but they are also trolls. They use their trolling to spread their message. currently, another dude called vegangains is trolling the fitness community as well.

i am a vegetarian, and it was seeing this documentary on the pork industry that started me on the vegetarian path. for anyone interested, its pretty off the charts disturbing and its australian as well. its pretty much made by dudes breaking into pork farms and filming what they find

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KArL5YjaL5U

Would the world be better if people cared where their food came from? probably, they might then care about other things too

do you become a better person if you dont eat meat? i feel like a better person mainly because animals aren’t being hurt because of me. i dont feel humans have to eat meat really… or at least not much. How can you watch that documentary on pork, know that that is pretty much whats going on and turn a blind eye to it? I think its basic empathy and just saying well ‘i like bacon so yeah’ is in my opinion wrong and i can see freleys point of view to an extent. In my opinion, at least these people believe in something. i see my money as my vote, henceforth im ethical as to what i do with it. free range eggs became mainstream for exactly this reason… although im pretty sure woolies and coles lobbied the state to change the definition of the word ‘free range’ at some point. I dont eat beef because the amount of resources that go into growing a cow are pretty crazy. Think about how much grass that cow needs to eat before it is harvested and how much space it requires. think of how many vegies you could grow in the same space with the same amount of water. lamb? comon, think about what your doing here… but that being said i think most vegans are total loons. People like freeley should be advocating for the destruction of lions and tigers, as lions and tigers murder other animals in truly horrific style. if we humans are smart enough to not harm animals, then we should be stopping the animals that harm other animals from existing. Freeley also kills birds when she flies in aeroplanes so she is a hypocrite.

feminism is one of the biggest problems in society today and although there is some valid historical basis to it, the liberation of the human female from their biology is in my opinion largely a product of the technological advance of humans. sufferagettes where never machine gunned on the streets, unlike the men that where drafted and sent off to war to die just a few years earlier. as technology has advanced, women have advanced as well, however now its going way too far and is pretty blatantly anti male in many respects. i view feminism in its modern context as a tool of the social marxists that really isnt doing society a great deal of good at this time. its screwing up gender dynamics and is wrecking women and men for each other. i see it as low frequency, lowest common denominator idiocy, just like a lot of the the race baiting ‘is this racist’ stuff getting around that is being perpetuated pretty much as a distraction, divide and conquer strategy by the power elite. idiots love this kind of bicker and beef… it would be funny if it wasn’t so serious

anyway

I agree with steven friar. gods a maniac

good show… keep making them

By r0Kb3B0p on 2015 07 14 - 21:05:32
From the entry 'Addictions, obsessions, fanaticisms and distractions'.

Really truthfull.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:56:36
From the entry 'Defending your personal health choices'.

Yeah sure authority aware.

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:28:55
From the entry 'What is the future of Australia?'.

Stay tuned for more rules here as usually is the case!!!

By OZE on 2015 07 07 - 16:21:50
From the entry 'Mass media disinformation and brainwashing dissected'.

Almost two months since the last broadcast! How the hell can you expect people to donate when you don’t broadcast? Looks like the ship of truth has sprung a leak. This broadcast has been part of my life almost since its inception…it is one of the few alternative news sources that hasn’t gone off the deep end, by dilution credible information with crap e.g. Fairdinkum Radio and Info Wars…Pittard started FR with some incredibly interesting material, but then he flipped…Today he sounds like a fundamentalist preacher, the Christian equivalent to a Fanatical Islamist. As an atheist, I think he’s really ###### up a potentially good show. As for Info Wars, all they would have to do to improve is dump Alex Jones, what a shit-for-brains. I reckon Jones and Pittard are allowed to proliferate, because they’re so stupid and harmless. I suppose they have some entertainment value, and along with David Icke are living examples of how low the alternative media has sunk. Truth News Radio is, or should I say was, way ahead of them all ahead of them all in terms of credibility How sad that its come to this.

By Eugene on 2015 06 28 - 17:28:56
From the entry 'Introducing Internet.org: Mark Zuckerberg's free 'private' internet which will soon be rolled out to 4 billion+ people'.

Richard Gage AIA speaks on worldwide press conference

Comments

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories